ChatGPT Scraper API
Use ChatGPT Scraper API to collect answers, available citations, and follow-up responses for brand and content research. Submit questions, retrieve their task results, and keep the original wording beside every conclusion your team draws.
Submit a question and receive a task ID immediately.
3 credits per question, deducted at submission; failed inputs are automatically refunded. Queries are free.
https://api.goanyapi.com/api/v1/chatgpt-scraper/tasks/{task_id}Loading saved example…
Run a request to see the response here
Fill in the demo parameters to preview an example response for free. Sign in to send live requests with your own parameters.
How ChatGPT Scraper API fits a research workflow
- 01
Submit an independent ChatGPT question
Submit the prompt and optional supported country. Save the task ID and inputs; acceptance does not mean the ChatGPT answer is ready.
- 02
Retrieve each ChatGPT result
Poll at least five seconds apart until a terminal state. Inspect every item status and retain failures alongside successful ChatGPT answers.
- 03
Deliver evidence with the brief
Use text for extraction, Markdown for a readable brief, and returned HTML for answer inspection. Store the raw ChatGPT response with the worksheet; your workflow handles long-term storage, schedules, and notifications.
Read a ChatGPT recommendation before counting mentions
A travel editor asks “Top hotels in Beijing” to study ChatGPT recommendations. The saved answer supplies names and positioning, without live room prices, availability, or verified booking advice.
Top hotels in Beijing
Beijing is the subject of the prompt, not evidence that the request used country CN.
01ChatGPT recommendation wording
The Peninsula Beijing: best overall luxury. Aman at Summer Palace: exclusivity and history. Rosewood Beijing: contemporary luxury.
02Structured citations in this sample
- citations: null
- links_attached: null
- 01Keep the reason with the mention
data.results[].result.answer_textExtract hotel names and nearby reasons from the ChatGPT answer. Keep the matching passage so reviewers can distinguish a recommendation from a passing mention.
- 02Check evidence separately
data.results[].result.citationsInspect returned citations independently from attached links and search sources. Requesting web search does not prove that a particular claim has supporting evidence.
Record each hotel, the exact recommendation, its audience, and a verification task. Citations are null in this sample. Do not invent source links or treat the order of recommendations as a market ranking.
Task-query fields live under data.results[].result. The default Tester shows the saved result object directly, without the task envelope.
Put ChatGPT answer data to work
Each answer is a sample for its question and settings, not a measure of all users, search demand or brand ranking.
Inspect ChatGPT brand and product mentions
Use answer_text or Markdown as input to your own mention analysis. The API does not calculate a brand score.
Review ChatGPT citations and sources
Inspect citations, links_attached and search_sources when present. Requesting sources or web search does not guarantee citations.
Compare ChatGPT questions and follow-ups
The API accepts up to 20 independent inputs per task. additional_prompt continues its own conversation. The page Tester submits one question.
Give your Agent a bounded ChatGPT research task
Connect and authorize GoAnyAPI, confirm the required tools are listed, then run a bounded research task.
Review hotel recommendation wording
Collect a bounded sample before interpreting mentions.
Confirm ChatGPT submit and query tools are available. First inspect the saved Beijing hotel sample. Extract hotel names, exact recommendation wording, and facts to verify; preserve null citations. Do not infer prices, availability, or market rankings. If fresh sampling is needed, show the prompt, supported country, and current cost before submitting once. Poll at least five seconds apart and check every item status.ChatGPT Scraper API FAQ
No. ChatGPT Scraper API collects website answers for research; it does not expose model selection. Use it to inspect answer presentation and returned evidence, without assuming its output matches a direct model API call.
No. It returns answers and possible citations. Mention analysis, scores, scheduling, historical storage and notifications require your agent or external workflow.
Not necessarily. A new accepted task returns HTTP 202 and queued. Poll at least 5 seconds apart. Inspect every results[].status: a succeeded batch can include failed questions.
No. web_search and require_sources request those behaviors. Fields can be absent, null or empty, and citations do not establish factual accuracy.
Choose a supported country code or omit it for automatic location. Location does not restrict prompt language. CN, HK and MO are unsupported; precise city-level results are not guaranteed.
Submission reserves the current per-input rate for each question. A follow-up is included. Successful inputs are billed; failed inputs are refunded. Queries are free. Missing answer fields or citations do not by themselves trigger a refund.
Reuse the same idempotency_key and identical inputs. A new key creates a separately billed task. Reusing a key with different inputs causes a conflict.
Completed results are retained for 30 days. Undelivered tasks have a 24-hour processing limit and are closed and refunded on subsequent processing or queries; refunds may be delayed. Store results externally for longer retention.
Yes. Inspect the saved ChatGPT illustration and complete JSON first. Editing inputs hides the default example; live results still show returned HTML. For Agent access, connect and authorize GoAnyAPI and confirm that both submit and query tools are listed.
Explore related GoAnyAPI APIs
Choose another signal for your research, then compare the results in context.